| |
- discourse
formation
-
- This concept is the
subject of chapter 2 of Archaeology
of Knowledge.
- He begins with a
criticism of the concept that everything
with the same label is not the same
thing and that the difference between
differently labeled things may be a
habit of thought.
- Suppose a society
called everything slightly red
"red" and grouped purple along
along with red in the process. And
compare this to a society that called
everything slightly orange
"orange," included red (but
not purple) under the category, but also
yellow. How would these two societies be
able to talk about the color of things?
They would be using different language
maps to organize colors and a simple
translation from one to the other
appears simply impossible.
- The problem is that
within our own language community we
fail to notice the way in which we are
constituting what we talk about by such
arbitrary language practices that have
become second nature to us. Studying
these discourse formations (or
discursive formations) is "archaeology."
We will try to grasp the implicit rules
we use that work together to form this
map of the world around us.
- Without knowing it, we
group distinguishable objects into
unities and thus constitute our objects.
An object is constituted like this by a "unity
of discourse". In
Wittgensteinian terms, this might mean
by a language game.) The unity of
discourse on a particular topic (or
object) "would be the interplay of
rules that define the transformation of
these objects, their non-identity
through time, the break produced in
them, the internal discontinuity that
suspends their permanence (Archaeology
of Knowledge, p.33). For example,
we constitute the object of
"marriage" by a set of rules
that allows us to say that we are
"married" together with the
interplay of rules that defines the
marriage as dissolved (annulled,
divorced, non-valid). Foucault suggests
that an archaeology
should examine the way this works, how
we control our mental taxonomy through
language practices.
- For a richer account
of this concept click
here to read a brief paraphrase of the
first chapter of Foucault's The
Archaeology of Knowledge
-
diseases
of power
- Foucault names two
"diseases of power" fascism
and Stalinism (Foucault Afterword, in
Dreyfus and Rabinow, p.209) These are
"excesses" of power.
dispositif
- The concept of an episteme
is insuficient and dispositif fills
in the gap. An episteme is
researched through the analysis of
discourse (text), but there are
practices (institutions, architectural
arrangments, regulations, laws,
administrative measures, scientific
statements, philosphic propositions,
morality, philanthropy) in addition to
discourse which we may use to do a
genealogical analysis of some particular
situation (Dreyfus and Rabinow,
p.121). These practices form an
intensified surveillance and control
mechanism (Darier, 589), creating policy
which polices and disciplines and which
leads to resistance among certain
groups.
discourse
- Practices obeying
certain rules: "Archaeology tries
to define not the thoughts,
representations, images, themes,
preoccupations that are concealed or
revealed in discourses; but those
discourses themselves, those discourses
as practices obeying certain rules (The
Archaeology of Knowledge,
138)."
- For a richer account
of this concept click
here to read a brief paraphrase of the
first chapter of Foucault's The
Archaeology of Knowledge
- domination
-
- domination is often
indirect. People often feel they are
fighting domination when they are
yielding to it. Domination is not merely
oppression that refuses to let these
people have their pleasure. People who
are resisting that kind of oppression
are often unwittingly supporting their
own domination. Power always requires
resistance (see Dreyfus and Rabinow,
p.169).
- Enkrateia
-
- "Self-control",
the power one must have over oneself to
use aphrodisia rightly; connected to
ascesis which is "training in
self-denial"
- episteme
-
- Equivalent to a
paradigm.
- gaze
-
- Penetrating and sage
observation. In the Birth of the Clinic,
Foucault speaks of the myth of the
clinical gaze, that is, the myth that
the physician can see into the heart of
a problem in order to diagnose and treat
it, and that this ability to know by
gazing is a result of the vast array of
observations that the clinician has
made.
- genealogy
-
- The genealogy of
knowledge consists of two separate
bodies of knowledge: First, the
dissenting opinions and theories that
did not become the established and
widely recognized and,
second, the local beliefs and
understandings (think of what nurses
know about medicine that does not
achieve power and general
recognition). The genealogy is
concerned with bringing these two
knowledges, and their struggles to pass
themselves on to others, out into
the light of the day.
- Genealogy does not
claim to be more true than
institutionalized knowledge, but merely
to be the missing part of the
puzzle. It works by isolating the
central components of some current day
political mechanism (such as maintaining
the power structure which diagnoses
mental illness) and then traces it back
to its historical roots (Dreyfus and
Rabinow, p.119). These historical
roots are visible to us only through the
two separate bodies of genealogical
knowledge described above.
- Foucault says,
"Let us give the term 'genealogy'
to the union of erudite knowledge and
local memories which allows us to
establish a historical knowledge of
struggles and to make use of this
knowledge tactically today (Genealogy
and social Criticism, p.42)."
- The genealogical side
of analysis tries to grasp the power of
constituting a domain of objects. If a
society were to institute the role of
medicine man, for example, and give him
special privileges, we would thereby
"constitute the object of medicine
man." Until we established
and institutionalized this practice,
nothing could be called a "medicine
man." The genealogy explores
what was not evident because of the
institutionalization of knowledge by
those in power.
- (See Discourse on
Language which is the appendix in the Archaeology
of Knowledge.); Whereas archaeologystudies
the practices of language (in a strict
sense), genealogy uncovers the creation
of objects through institutional
practices (Dreyfus & Rabinow,
p.104). Whereas the archeological
historian claims to write from a
neutral, disinterested perspective, the
Nietzschean or Foucaultian genealogist
admits the political and polemical
interests motivating the writing of the
history (Hoy, 1986, p.6-7).`
- For
a richer account of this concept click
here to read a brief paraphrase of the
first chapter of Foucault's The
Archaeology of Knowledge
general
grammar
-
- "general grammar
is the study of verbal order in
relationship to the simultaneity that it
is its task to represent (The Order of
Things, p.83)." "It
appeared in the second half of the
seventh century and faded away during
the last years of the following century
(The Order of Things, p.91)."
- genesis
-
- genesis - the analysis
of the constitution of orders
on the basis of empirical series
(Order of things, p.78)."
- government
-
- [B]y government
Foucault meant not so much the political
or administrative structures of the
modern state as 'the way in which the
conduct of individuals or of groups
might be directed: the government of
children, of souls, of communities, of
families, of the sick.... To govern, in
this sense, is to structure the possible
field of action of others' (Burchell et
al, 1991, cited by Smart, 1992). (Also
see Foucault's afterword in Dreyfus and
Rabinow, p.221)
- governmentality
-
- A centralization and
increased government power. This power
is not negative. In fact, it produces
reality through "rituals of
truth" and it creates a particular
style of subjectivity with which one
conforms to or resists. Because the
individuals are taken into this
subjectivity they become part of the
normalizing force. Governmentality also
includes a growing body of knowledge
that presents itself as
"scientific," and which
contributes to the power of
governmentality. This is a term
introduced by Foucault in the resume
(199) and illustrated in other
articles (1979b) 1981, 1984a. (see Darier).
Also see Foucault's
article on this topic.
- Governmentality is a
novel kind of governing that emerged in
Europe during the sixteenth century. It
happened when feudalism was failing and
when their was a loss of power in the
absolute monarch. Even though we
do not have absolute power of the
monarch now, we do have
government. To a large extent this
is internalized by people, but there is
also surveillance and reinforcement for
conforming to the rules. This new
kind of governmentality was made
possible by the creation of specific
(expert or professional) "knowledges"
as well as the construction of experts,
institutions and disciplines (e.g.,
medicine, psychology, psychiatry) so
that individuals who we think of as
experts can claim the knowledge
necessary to command the power of
governmentality. .
heteroptia
-
- A space in which
contradictory elements are
juxtaposed.
historicity
-
- The historical bias of
each author, each society, each academic
discipline. There is no narrative
that describes history apart from the
situatedness of the story-teller.
"Thus, behind the history of the positivities,
there appears another, more radical
history, that of man hmself - a history
that now concerns man's very being since
he now realizes that he not only 'has
history' all around him, but is himself,
in his own historicity, that by means of
which a history of human life, a history
of economics, and a history of languages
are given their form (The Order of
Things, p.370)."
- historicism
-
- A means of working
with the problem that all
"history" is history from the
perspective of the historian.
"Historicism is a means of
validating for itself the perpetual
critical relation at play between
History and the human sciences (The
Order of Things,
p.372)." All knowledge is
rooted in a life, a society, and a
language that have a history; and it is
in that very history that knowledge
finds the element enabling it to
communicate with other forms of life
(The Order of Things,
p.372/3)."
- mathesis
-
- The science of
calculable order
(The Order of Things, p.73) a
qualitative science of order (see The
Order of Things, pp. 74-75 ).
- negative
power
-
- Negative power is
"power that says no."
(Power/Knowledge, p.139) It is the power
that says that something cannot be done
and that acts to enforce this law.
Positive power inspires and solves
certain problems, enables, serves use to
someone.
- measurement
-
- Measurement enables us
to to analyze like things according to
the calculable form of identity and
difference (The Order of Things, p.53).
- normalisation
-
- The molding of people
into "normal" as opposed to
"abnormal" forms., and the
process by which a culture encourages
its people to regulate and achieve his
or her own conformity with the
established rules. This is achieved
through governmentality.
- order
-
- Order can be
established without reference to an
exterior unit. (He seems to be thinking
of "order" as a kind of
sorting and establishing of
priorities.)
- panopticon
-
- The method of
surveillance in the modern prison - this
is the method that the modern state uses
to execute and regulate its control of
society. Unlike the monarchical state,
which uses brute force to control its
subjects, the 'democratic' state
requires internalized and sophisticated
coercion to perform this function.
The term "panopticon" was a
name suggested by Jeremy Bentham (Bentham,
1995). In a prison built with
modern architecture that allows guards
to see continuously inside each cell,
the "panopticon" is the
central observing tower even though the
prisoners cannot see that they are being
observed. This constant gaze
controls the prisoners affecting not
only what they do but how they see
themselves. and replaced the use
of a dungeon and dark cell to control
the prisoner (1979a, 170). This
image serves as a metaphor for the power
in of governmentality in the modern
state.
- pastoral
power
-
- The kind of power that
is exercised by the Church. It rests on
the church's power to assure individual
salvation in the next world. It is
linked with the notion of individualism
(as in individual salvation). In modern
times, the salvation in the next life
has been commuted to a salvation in this
life (health, wellbeing, security, etc.)
(Dreyfus
and Rabinow, 1982, 213-215) .
- pathologization
- There are two senses:
First, the natural depletion of the
organism producing tremors,
perturbations, etc., and second, the
"discovery" that at the root
of sexuality is a source of illness in
the form of a hidden passivity.
Sexuality is therefore not evil but the
source of ills. (Foucault, Care of the
Self, p.142)
- police
-
- The job of the police
is the articulation and administration
of techniques of bio-power
so as to increase the state's
control over its inhabitants.
- positivity
-
- (The Order of Things,
p.348).
- power
-
- Power is exerted
implicitly by the way in which our
conversation (i.e., discourse) is
formed, and it is often exerted by
denying its own truth, or by myths that
misrepresent the source of power by
pointing to less powerful sources. For
example, in the History of Sexuality,
Foucault explains that we moderns tend
to think of our sexuality as repressed
by social forces that forbid us sexual
release. The myth here is that we are
sexually repressed but this popularity
of this myth deeply shapes the nature of
our sexuality by introducing the ritual
of confession. We confess (in church, in
psychoanalysis) the thoughts which
nature tells us should be free (or we
would be free of if we were not
repressed) but which, due to the nature
of our repression cause us to suffer in
secret humiliation. But what is powerful
today is less any mythical repression of
our sexuality and more the myth of
repression that leads us to have faith
in the ritual of confession to free us
of our psychic pain. This myth, and its
corresponding ritual, implicitly design
our sexual experience by telling us what
our sexual experience should be, what we
should look for, and by coloring that
experience not only with shame and
self-reproach but with the hidden
excitement and fascination that makes
our sexuality what it is.
- Power is also fueled
by resistance. Without resistance, all
power fades.
- The above is the major
theme in "The History of
Sexuality," however see especially
pp 56-69. Here are a few representative
quotations:
- "The important
thing...is not that ...men shut their
eyes or stopped their ears, or that they
were mistaken [about sexual repression];
it is rather that they constructed
around and appropos of sex an immense
apparatus for producing truth, even if
this truth was to be masked at the last
moment." (56)
- "Historically,
there have been two great procedures for
producing the truth of sex.(57)"
One is the technique of having erotic
masters who "can transmit this art
in an esoteric manner.(57)"
The second procedure is the
"confession," and today,
"western man has become a
confessing animal.(59)"
"The obligation to confess is now
relayed through so many different
points, is so deeply ingrained in us,
that we no longer perceive it as the
effect of a power that constrains us; on
the contrary, it seems to us that truth,
lodged in our most secret nature,
"demands" only to
surface;..." (60)
- The two principal
texts in which Foucault evaluates and
and substantiates his model of power
relations are Power/Knowledge: Selected
Interviews & Other Writings
1972-1977 and The History of Sexuality,
Vol. 1, An Introduction.
power/knowledge
-
- Knowledge of how
people's behavior can be affected. It is
based on new techniques of social
engineering, education, etc.
- reflexive
form of knowledge
-
- What we know about
ourselves not by introspection but by
reflection (The Order of Things,
363).
- representation
-
- That which can be cast
in a quantifiable and scientifically
rigorous form. "Usually, the
attempt is made to define it [positivity]
in in terms of mathematic: either by
trying to bring it as near to
mathematics as possible, by drawing up
an inventory of everything in the
sciences of man that is mathematicizable,
and suppose that everything that is not
susceptible of such a formalization has
not yet attained to scientific (The
Order of Things, p.363).
- repressive
hypothesis
-
- A term that Foucault
introduces in the History of
Sexuality. It is the view that
truth is is repressed by a powerful
force and that we can liberate ourselves
by getting down to the truth.
Foucault opposes the "repressive
hypothesis" to "bio-technico-power
(or bio-power). (Dreyfus and Rabinow, p.
127). The repressive hypothesis about
sexuality is that western civilization
has moved from a time of shameless
sexuality to an era of repressed
sexuality, restricted to the parents'
bedroom. (Part 2 of the five part The
History Sexuality is called The
Repressive Hypothesis). The
repressive hypothesis holds that sex is
repressed because it is incompatible
with the work ethic in the rise of
capitalism during the last two
centuries.
- In the repressive view
of power "[All power] can do is
forbid, and all it can command is
obedience. Power, ultimately, is
repression; repression, ultimately, is
the imposition of the law; the law,
ultimately, demands submission."
(Dreyfus & Rabinow, p. 130)
resistance
-
- "there are no
relations of power without
resistance" (1980, 142)
- similitude
-
- Foucault teaches this
concept by example from Bacon: The human
Intellect, from its peculiar nature,
easily supposes a greater order and
equality in things than it actually
finds; and, while there are many things
in Nature unique, and quite irregular,
still it feigns parallels,
correspondents, and relations that have
no existence. Hence that fiction,
"that among the heavenly bodies all
motion takes place by perfect
circles" (The Order of Things,
p.52).
- Sophrosyne
-
- "Discretion"
or "wisdom", it also means
"chastity"; the KNOWLEDGE,
which can be of the ultimate meaning of
the nature and purpose of love/sex, by
which one can practice aphrodisia,
chresis, and enkrateia
successfully.
- self-fashioning
-
- Care of the self--
This is analogous to
self-government.
- subjugated
knowledges -
-
- a whole set of
knowledges that are either hidden
behind more dominant knowledges but
can be revealed by critique or have
been explicitly disqualified as
inadequate to their task or
insufficiently elaborated: naive
knowledges, located low down on the
hierarchy, beneath the required level
of cognition or scientificity (1980,
p. 82). "When I say
'subjugated knowledges' I mean two
things. On the one hand, I am
referring to historical contents that
have been buried or masked in
functional coherences or formal
systemizations. [In other words,
I am referring to] blocks of
historical knowledges that were
present in the functional and
systematic ensembles, but which were
masked, and the critique was able to
reveal their existence by using,
obviously enough, the tools of
scholarship. Second, when I say
'subjugated knowledges' I am also
referring to a whole series of
knowledges that have
been disqualified as...insufficiently elaborated
knowledges:
naive knowleges, hierarchically
inferior knowledges, knowledges that
are below the required level of
erudition or scientificity" (Foucault,
2003, p.7).
-
- subjugated
-
- being made subject
to, being governed by
institutionalized forces that control
and and frame.(1982,
p. 213)
- subjectivity
-
-
- subjugation.(subjection).
-
taxinomia
- When dealing with
the ordering of complex natures
(representations in general, as they
are given in experience), one has to
constitute a taxinomia, and to do that
one has to establish a system of
signs. These signs are to the order of
composite natures what algebra is to
the order of simple natures. But in so
far as empirical representations must
be analyzable into simple natures, it
si clear that the taximonia relates
wholly to the mathesis (The Order of
Things, p.72)
- technologies
of self
-
- Technologies of the
self are the specific practices by
which subjects constitute themselves
as subjects within and through systems
of power, and which often seem to be
either 'natural' or imposed from
above.
-
truth
- "The
important thing here...is that truth
isn't outside power, or lacking in
power: contrary to a myth whose
history and functions would repay
further study, truth isn't the
reward of free spirits, the child of
protracted solitude, nor the
privilege of those who have
succeeded in liberating themselves.
Truth is a thing of this world: it
is produced only by virtue of
multiple forms of constraint."
In other words, our institutions and
schools of thought, our universities
and charismatic leaders, our
ministers our parents, our teachers,
all of these collaborate to create a
context in which something is
established as "true." And
think of truth as that which emerges
only within certain sets of rules
(much like Lyotard's notion of local
definitions). For example, the rules
of science say that we should define
our concepts operationally, using
specific measurement techniques.
Studies of bone density, for
example, must define it either as
measurement of bone density of
spine, the femur, the metacarpal or
some other boney structure. But,
since the density of these various
bones is not highly correlated,
different studies who use different
bones will uncover "different
truths." Truth emerges only
within a structure of rules that
control the language, the
discourse."Truth presents
itself as the product of discursive
practices." (Pasquino)
-
unity
of discourse
- "the unity of
discourses on madness would not be
based upon the existence of the
object 'madness', or the
constitution of a single horizon of
objectivity; it would be the
interplay of the rules that make
possble the appearance of objects
during a given period of time:
objects are shaped by measures of
discrimination and repression,
objects that are differentiated in
daily practice, in law, in religious
casuitry, in medical diagnosis,
objects that are manifested in
pathological descriptions, objects
that are circumscribed by medical
codes, practices, treatment, and
care. Moreover, ...the unity
of the discourse on madness would be
the interplay of the rules that
define the transformations of these
different objects, their
non-identity through time, the break
produced in them, the intrnal
discontinuity that suspends their
permanence."
-
Quotation is from The archeology
of Knowledge, p.32-33) For
a richer account of this concept click
here to read a brief paraphrase of
the first chapter of Foucault's The
Archaeology of Knowledge
References
Bentham,
Jeremy (1995). The Panopticon Writings
(edited and introduced by Miran Bozovic),
London: Verso.
Burchell,
G., Gordon, C. & Miller, P. (eds.) The
Foucault Effect: Studies in
Governmentality, London: Harvester
Wheatsheaf, 1991.
Darier,
Eric. (1996). Environmental
Governmentality: The Case of Canada's
Green Plan. Environmental Politics, 5(4),
585-606.
Dreyfus,
Hubert L. & Rabinow, Paul. (1982).
Michel Foucault: beyond Structualism and
Hermeneutics. Chigao: The University of
Chicago Press.
Foucault,
Michel (1982). Afterword: The Subject and
Power. In Dreyfus, Hubert L. &
Rabinow, Paul. (1982). Michel Foucault:
beyond Structualism and Hermeneutics.
Chigao: The University of Chicago Press,
208-226.
Foucault,
Michel. (1970)(1969-French version)
(A. M. Sheridan Smith trans.) The
Archaeology of Knowledge and the discourse
on language. New York: Pantheon
books.
Foucault,
Michel (1973) (1961-French version)
(translator Richard Howard). Madness
and Civiiliztion: The History of Insanity
in the Age of Unreason. New York:
Vintage Books.
Foucault,
Michel (1978)(1976-French version)
(translator Robert Hurley) The History of
Sexuality: volume 1: An introduction. New
Yor: Vintage Books.
Foucault,
Michel (1978). The Birth of the Clinic: An
Archeology of Medical Perception. New
York: Vintage Books.
Foucault,
Michel (1979a)[1975] Discipline and
Punish: The Birth of the Prison, New York:
Vintage.
Foucault,
Michel (1979b). 'Governmentality",
Ideology and Consciousness, No. 6, Summer
1986, 5-21.
Foucault,
Michel (1980), In Colin Gordeon (ed.).
Power/Knowledge - Selected Interviews and
Other Wiritings 1972-1977, Brighton:
Harvester Press.
Foucault,
Michel (1981), 'Omnes et Singulatim:
Toward a Criticism of 'Political Reason',
In The Tanner Lectures of Human Values.
II, Salt Lake City, UT: University of Utah
Press/ Cambridge University Press, pp.
223-54.
Foucault,
Michel (1984a). "Space, Knowledge and
Power." In Paul Rabinow (ed.), The
Foucault Reader, New York: Pantheon Books,
pp. 239-56.
Foucault,
Michel (1989), Resume des cours 190-1982,
Paris: conferences, essais et lecons du
college de France/Julliard.
Foucault,
Michel. (1994)genealogy
and Social Criticism. In Steven
Seidman (Ed.) The Postmodern Turn: New
Perspectives on Social theory. Cambridge,
MA: Cambridge University Press.
(reprinted from Foucault, M.
Power/knowledge. Pantheon Books,
1977)
Foucault,
Michel (1994) (1966-French version)
(translator unknown). The Order of Things:
An Archaeology of the Human Sciences. New
York: Vintage Books.
Foucault,
Michel. Care of the Self: Volume 3 of The
History of Sexuality. (trans Robert
Hurley) New York: Random House,
1986.
Foucault,
Michel. Society Must Be Defended:
Lectures at the College de France,
1975-76. St. Martin's Press (2003).
Gordon,
Colin (Ed.) (1981). Power/Knowledge:
Selected Interviews & Other Writings
1972-1977 by Michel Foucault. New York:
Random House.
Hoy,
D. C. (1986). Introduction. In D. C.
Hoy, Foucault: A Critical Reader.
New York: Basil Blackwell, 1-25.
Smart,
B. (1992). Review of The Foucault Effect.
Sociology, 26(3), 559-560.
|
|